What does it mean to explain the past Why do historians disagree so often in their
To explain is not to describe, but to make clear, too show meaning of, to account for. ... A historian’s job in society is to look at the past and ‘explain’ the historical content of things that have passed to the rest of the world. ... The past is defined as belonging to the time before the present; no longer existing or happening. The past is driven by the present. To know what the past held you need the history, which comes in different formats. ... By using work done to explain the past, you must be capable of different arguments constrained by evidence. ... When explaining the past there are many rules the historian has to follow to make the piece of work valid. ... Alun Munslow, the author of ‘Deconstructing History’, states that history is a form of knowledge, from which historians have to study the past, to produce work that is a reliable and objective piece of knowledge. ... He goes on to say that the most basic function of the historian is to understand, and explain in a written form, the connections between events and human intention or agency in the past. Basically saying that the historians has to work out some kind of method or means whereby he/she can grasp the relationship between knowledge and explanation in order to find the foundation of truth, if one exists. There are popular interests in the past; they come in many different forms such as heritage sites, historical documents, costume dramas on televisions or a quest` for ones family origin. This gives us a sense of people being aware of the past. ... The mental difference is based on the individual attitude of the past and the values and feeling’s it creates for the person, for example you could use the most famous poet of Italy Pentrach’s ascent of Mount Ventoux (c.