In the future, should bylaws be used to ensure that only objective views are presented in the media?
...ous Huxley’s novel, Brave New World, the people were manipulated to believe in the beliefs of the World State. The use of hypnopaedia to teach them their castes and predestined roles in the world. “… all wear green, and Delta children wear khaki. Oh no, I don’t want to play with Delta children. And Epsilons were still worse. They’re too stupid to be able to read or write. Besides they wear black, which is such a beastly colour. I’m so glad I’m a Beta.” Manipulated and controlled, they weren’t given any choice. In the same way media is being used to manipulate the people by hiding the truth and portraying only one point of view which is not enough to judge who is “right” and who is “wrong”, what is “good” and what is “bad”. Throughout the past couple of decades media been used as a dictionary. People look up the words they don’t understand in T.V. rather than in an actual dictionary and people tend to believe everything the media throws at them without questioning media’s initiatives. According to Oxford English dictionary, the word Terrorism has been defined as: “The use of violence for political reasons”. Does this mean that America is also terrorist nation? but currently the media twists and turns and sums up the definition of Terrorism in just one word; “Muslims”. Why is it when a Jewish male can grow his beard in order to practice his faith but when a Muslim does the same, he is an extremist and terrorist; Why is it that a nun can be covered from head to toe in order to devote herself to God, but when a Muslimah does the same, she is called oppressed; Why is it when a Christian or a Jewish kills someone, their religion is not mentioned, but when a Muslim is charged with a crime, it is Islam that goes to trial; why is it when someone drives a perfect car in a bad way, no one blames the car, but when a Musl...