Anzac Cove The Rubbish Issue
... middle of the night.” The tone used in this article is described as angry and disappointed in what he says is a fact that young Australians are disrespectful. He stated Mr Deighton’s point of view because I am certain that he agrees with him. The first argument in support of my contention comes from a letter that John Brennan from London sent to the Herald Sun. Jason Brennan from London said he was disappointed to return home to London to see headlines about Australians that travelled all the way to Gallipoli and showing their respect and getting accused of being disrespectful. The tone of writing John Brennan from London used in his letter decribes his disappointment as he saw the headlines returning home after Anzac Day. It disappointed him to see those headlines because he saw everyone behaving in a respectful manner. The second argument against my contention is shown in a letter from Jennifer Knight of Hoddles Creek. She said that John Howard has got it all wrong. Jennifer Knight said that we shouldn’t treat the disposal of rubbish at a sacred site as acceptable. Her tone in this letter described her point of view as a disagreement towards John Howard as he acted as if it were acceptable to leave our rubbish at the sacred site. The second argument in support of my contention is shown in the article “PM Defends Anzac Pilgrims.” In this article John Howard said, “I’ll not hear a bad word against those young Australians.” He was backing the Australians that attended the dawn service in Anzac Cove. This shows that Mr Howard has full support of the Australians that showed respect and does not want to hear that they were disrespectful. There is a reason of the loud music played and the rubbish that was left there and the reasons are simple. The loud music was played to keep the pilgrims awake and the rubbish was there because there were no rubbish bins supplied for the oc...