Catholisism
... the ways that he proved his points. To me it was impressive how one man could realize such irrelevant things that got by 11 other men. That also is an example of how something that people think is irrelevant can be the decision making piece of evidence. Overall I think that this man believed in himself self enough to turn 11 opinions and I think that is a trait that should be respected by people, because it is hard to have that much self confidence when you have 11 other men that think you’re nuts. Question #2 I think that the men’s personal backgrounds and experiences affected their verdicts a great deal. I think that juror number 9, the racist, was a perfect example. He was taking out his personal problems with Spanish and Mexican people, against the Spanish boy that was on trial. I think that is one of the worst things you can do, just because one person of a certain ethnicity is a bad membe...