|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
The Aff would like you to believe that National Security can take prescience over our civil liberties. ... National Security Decisions made in haste and fear are poor
2. National Security is the thin edge of the wedge
3. National Security leads to eroding the power of the people
4. National Security lends itself to intolerance
5. National Security protects the gov’t and corporations not civil liberties
As stated by Thurgood Marshall, “
To place such power into one person’s hands, may it be male or female, either one would go over the edge and undermine the basis of democracy. ... That simple saying convinced people that it was all right to suspend civil liberties for their “National Security.”
October 1970, the FLQ crisis appeared to be one of National Security, where Trudeau “destroyed” civil liberties for national security using excessive force. ... L and G, you need to ask yourself, when a man asked if he would destroy civil liberties for national security, he response was “just watch me” and equipped the armed forces with machines of such destruction, was he really trying to protect us from separatism or was he just kicking ass?
Approximate Word count = 813
Approximate Pages = 3.3
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|