evolution
...ntific method, a theory must be proved by observation, and the theory must be repeatable or testable. No one will ever be able to observe what is supposed to have happened over a period of billions of years. If some one had observed it, he would have to demonstrate proof of that observation to others. And no one could ever see it happen twice or design any experiment to falsify the theory. For example, if evolution actually occurs, we haven’t ruled out the possibility that the creation alternative is the one that occurred. That is there are two possibilities; and proving that evolution is possible does not establish it as the exclusive solution to what actually happened in our history. Even if evolution were possible, that would not prove that it actually occurred. God is the other possibility. There would be more than one possibility, and it would be necessary to rule one out. The scientific method is: III. Actually, the situation is quite bleak for evolutionists. Evolution is false according to other evidence against it. Intelligent design. Instead of supporting evolution, recent contributions have shown that the opposite is true, and evolution is not possible. This is possible by showing that the basic assumption of the theory is not true. Large changes are not practical so it is argued that many small changes occur. Even the smallest change is not possible. This assumption that evolutionary progress could be made by small gradual changes is not true. The recent science ...