poverty
...to have to live through it. She also intends to have people who think they are stuck in poverty, when really their reality is luxury to people in this kind of a situation to read it. Parker begins much of her paragraphs using poverty is, and just lists off what she believes to be poverty through her own personal experiences. The author uses poverty is... to get the images out to her audience that she wants them to picture to get the full impact of her message of poverty out. In “Canada’s gangrene” John Ralston Saul opens up his essay with the believe of citizen’s right. He believes that everyone has the right to well-being. Saul’s intended audience would be anyone that believed that the Human rights was complete, and to everyone in the world in general who don’t experience poverty themselves. Although Saul does not experience poverty him self he believes that there should be something done about it. Saul wants to get his message out to the world of how he fews people view poverty and how people who live in poverty view themselves. Saul talks about how Canada is stuck in the middle class, and there isn’t much of poverty in Canada its self. If a Canadian where to travel to the poverty of Africa they would be blown away with what is actually “real” poverty. While us Canadians believe that the worst poverty to be in ourselves is to have one meal a day, while people all around the world don’t have a meal for weeks, even months. In both of these essay’s the authors discuss poverty. “Canada’s gangrene” is more of a formal essay, while “ What is Poverty?” is more of an essay where someone’s thoughts where thrown together in. Saul uses more vocabulary and structured his essay in more of a professional way then that of what Parker did. Parker’s essay is more emotional than the formal way Saul came upon his. The most obvious difference among these essay’s is the fact that Parker is going through poverty while Saul is just writing about it. Parker has the advantage of grabbing the attention of her audience better because she is trapped in poverty. Saul’s essay is more of a piece that you would want to read if you wanted the facts of poverty and what is being done, and what isn’t being done about the situation. Whi...