|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
... "
–The 16th Amendment
The first direct tax on the income of the US citizen was unconstitutionally imposed by President Abraham Lincoln, August 5, 1861. ... In 1913, the 16th Amendment to the Constitution made the income tax a permanent fixture in the U. ... The amendment gave Congress legal authority to tax income and resulted in a revenue law that taxed incomes of both individuals and corporations.
When the income tax amendment was added to the U. ... In case its not obvious, the Social Security tax and the Medicare tax are both based on income and would be prohibited if the 16th Amendment were repealed (Jacobs). ... Benson of South Holland, Illinois, a criminal investigator for the Illinois Department of Revenue, commenced a project to examine the process of the ratification of the 16th Amendment to determine if the amendment had really been lawfully made a part of the Constitution. ...
After review of these records, he began to see that serious problems existed as to weather these states had legally ratified the same amendment which had been proposed by Congress. When examination of the records of about 20 states showed that many had not ratified the amendment and that information regarding the action taken by these States had been sent to the U. ... After several days of fruitless searches, he came across a book that documented all the legal proceedings concerning the 16th Amendment. This proved to be an outstanding discovery because those documents revealed that a man named Philander Chase Knox, the Secretary of State in 1913, was fully aware that the amendment had not been ratified nonetheless. After making this important discovery, Bill decided it was essential that he also study the records of all other states which the federal government claimed had ratified the amendment. ... In this examination, he notes; “The federal government claims that the State of Kentucky was the second state to ratify the amendment, such action taking place on February 8, 1910. ... These records show that the Kentucky House proposed a resolution to adopt the amendment and then sent that resolution to the Senate in early February, 1910. ... The Kentucky Senate never did ratify that amendment, but federal officials, being in possession of documents showing this rejection, fraudulently claimed otherwise”. ... That legislative assembly never recorded any vote upon any proposal to adopt the amendment proposed by Congress. ... Many states engaged in the illegal activity of amending the language of the amendment proposed by congress, a power that these states did not possess. Upon further investigation, Benson finds that the State of Minnesota sent nothing to the Secretary of State in Washington, but this did not deter Philander Knox as he claimed that Minnesota ratified the amendment regardless of the absence of any documentation from the State of Minnesota.
Approximate Word count = 2291
Approximate Pages = 9.2
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|