|
Euthanasia is one of societies more frequently debated moral issues of the present time. More directly, active euthanasia, which by definition, is; "Doing something, such as administering a lethal drug, or using other means that cause a persons death."1 Passive euthanasia, defined as; "Stopping (or not starting) some treatment, which allows a person to die, the persons condition causes his or her death,"2 seems not to be as debated, perhaps not as recognized, as its counterpart. I have chosen to look more closely at the issue of active euthanasia, and whether or not it would be considered ethical, by Kantian standards.
Those who support the practice of active euthanasia might argue that helping the terminally ill to bring about their own deaths, allowing them to determine the how and when, is not only humane, but also allows the person, who is simply "living to die," to maintain dignity by orchestrating their own end, thus letting them die at peace, rather than suffer to the end, perceiving themselves to be a burden and/or disgrace, to those they love. ... Those who are against active euthanasia would say not, and would argue that by participating in the practice of active euthanasia, one is "playing God," or perhaps, even worse, that they are not acting out of mercy, but rather out of selfishness, attempting to lessen their own burden, and that therefore, the act is nothing less than cold-blooded murder.
Approximate Word count = 1117
Approximate Pages = 4.5
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
