and build personal relationship. Solid pleasant relationship
... These issues include: (1) whether Memorial Hospital is liable for negligence toward Millie Brackens, (2) whether Dr. ... Taras is liable for failure to detect the problems of Mille Brackens and whether Dr. ... Jones was Millie Brackens physician for many years. ... Jones is an agent of Millie Brackens. Millie Brackens and Dr. ... As a result, a “fiduciary relationship” between Brackens and Jones is created. ... As a result, the hospital has an agency relationship with all the patients in the hospital which makes the hospital liable for negligence toward Millie Brackens. ... At all time, Millie Brackens believed that Dr. ... In the first issue, we need to analyze whether Memorial Hospital is liable for negligence towards Millie Brackens. ... Since Memorial Hospital was negligent in performing to the patients, it can be said that Memorial Hospital is liable for the damages to Millie Brackens. ... Jones is liable for damages to Millie Brackens. This can be analyzed as the type of relationship created between Millie Brackens and Memorial Hospital. ... Jones is a direct agent of Millie Brackens from the facts that Dr. ... Jones is an agent of Millie Brackens and is subject to the laws of liability for agents. ... Conclusion In conclusion, I believe that Millie Brackens can sue each of the defendants. ... Jones is liable for the negligence and damages to the principle Millie Brackens because he had negligent performed the incorrect surgery and malpractice. ... Jones is an employee of the hospital and under the Doctrine or Respondeat Superior (See Section on Law), Memorial Hospital is liable for the tortious act toward Millie Brackens. In addition, Memorial Hospital is not liable for damages to Millie Brackens based on Dr.