|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
To reach a fundamental understanding of the complexity surrounding the interconnectedness between war and archeology one needs to, as is said, study up. ... Nations through out the globe have made use of archeological finds to base ideas and ideologies of nationalism, hegemony, and identity. ... Thus war, the aggressive conflict between sovereigns, and archeology, the foundation of an embedded national identity, are fundamental facets in the production of ‘culture’.
“War: what is it good for? ...
For an invading country who’s motive behind a pre-emptive war was releasing the world from harms way (weapons of mass destruction) and liberating an oppressed people (operation Iraqi freedom) the protection of the ancient legacy of by-gone civilizations should have been viciously protected. ... The multifaceted cultural roots of the country are crucial components for consideration when discussing the impacts of war. ... Of the most notable, the Sumerian, Babylonian, Assyrian, and Persian are kept in close range to a sense of Iraqi cultural identity. ... In various articles found highlighting the “rebuilding” of Iraq it was often inferred that “arts and culture are areas where strong symbols of national identity still exist and therefore crucial to nation-building” (Boodhoo 2003:1).
Approximate Word count = 1938
Approximate Pages = 7.8
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|