|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
... One such way of looking at historical change is by critically examining individuals using the Great Man Theory. This theory looks at individuals and their influence on history using the following questions: “Were their actions beneficial? ... In looking objectively at the material, Augustus and Caesar both fulfill the criteria; however, whichever one fulfills the criteria more fully is up to the discretion and subjective opinion of the examiner, thus exposing one of the flaws in the Great Man Theory and the idea that neither man is the greater Great Man. ... Julius Caesar’s greatest achievement or contribution was to expand the Roman Empire and to grant those conquered with naturalized citizenship. ... The same could be said for when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon. ...
Secondly, in examining a man according to the Great Man Theory, historians decide how intentional each person’s actions were. ... When Ceasar crossed the Rubicon, Plutarch narrates that he changed his mind quite a few times. ... Many of these actions were intended to masquerade his one-man rule. Augustus knew that he could not institute one-man rule as a monarchy, it had to be disguised. Both Julius Caesar’s and Augustus’ actions were intentional, however to decide which had more intent to their actions is again subjective. To conclude, to decide which man’s actions were more intentional would involve understanding the thoughts of each man. This is humanly impossible and therefore there is no conclusive evidence as to which man had the stronger desire and sense of responsibility.
Approximate Word count = 1183
Approximate Pages = 4.7
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|