|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
Rawls argues that the distribution of natural endowments, such as talents and interests, or social endowments, such as wealth and social position, should not play a factor in the distribution of social goods or opportunities in a just society. ... In order to determine whether Rawls’ argument holds true, we must first discuss the principles of justice that he is basing his reasoning on.
First off, in order to establish principles of justice, there must be an original position that everyone accepts as fair. As Rawls explains it, “Among the essential features of this situation is that no one knows his placed in society, his class position of social status, nor does any one know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength, and the like.” “The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance” (Rawls, 11). The reason for this veil of ignorance is to ensure that everyone is equal and that no one can choose certain principles that would allow him or her an advantage over someone else. The principals of justice must be in an initial position that everyone agrees is equal and fair.
Rawls feels that two main principles of justice exist in agreeing with the original position. The two principles are as follows: “First: each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with the similar scheme of liberties for others. Second: social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all” (Rawls, 53). ... But in order for these principles to be valid, Rawls argues, natural or social endowments can not determine a person’s life chances.
The arbitrariness of the distribution of natural endowments and social endowments creates a problem when trying to appeal to the notion of justice.
Approximate Word count = 1547
Approximate Pages = 6.2
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|