Nature vs Nurture Regarding Mental Ability
The nature versus nurture debate has been a classic controversy among experts for centuries. ... The purpose of this paper is to prove that the mental aptitude of a person is determined by his genetics, along with his environment, which affects it more. The nature side of the debate argues that a person maintains his mental ability only based on what he is born with genetically. Defending this side of the debate would be establishing that a person’s environment plays no role in determining his mental aptitude. ... In general, twin studies support the nature side of the debate (Morris and Maisto 82). ... These studies also partially support the nurture side of the debate. ... Conversely, many investigations have shown that a person’s environment plays a large role in their mental aptitude. ... The amount of nourishment an individual receives has been proven to play a very large part in a person’s mental ability. ... Starving people across the world show why lack of nutrients in human bodies can stunt mental evolution as well as physical growth. ... Adoption studies have also somewhat shows that a person’s environment plays an important role in their mental ability. ... Considering the evidence stated previously in this paper, it would be a result of ignorance to believe that one sole factor, either genetics or environment, determines a person’s mental ability. It is rather obvious that both of these factors contribute to a person’s mental aptitude. ... A person’s entire environment seems to be more effectual in determining their mental ability than heredity. ... “Nature designs blueprints and nurture modifies them each step of the way” (Dempsey and Zimbardo 164). ... The mental disorder schizophrenia is one of these circumstances. ... The mental abilities of humans are determined by an individual’s genetics. There is also substantial proof that an individual’s environment affects their mental aptitude.