The Plot Evaluation of A Doll’s House
...operating in Norway 1879 thus Nora’s exodus at the play’s conclusion is a particularly brave and dangerous act.”(115). However, after Nora’s secrets are reveled and Torvald rejects her request for forgiveness, she realizes she had been living under Torvald’s control and no unconditional love had been present. As a result, leaving Torvald was Nora’s only way to separate with him so she could finally pursue and obtain self pride and independence. The complication of the story, the forgery of the signature in her father’s will is a valid conflict leading to the plot. During the time written, women couldn’t borrow money without their husband’s consent so Nora doing whatever she could to pay off the Kim 2 money such as continuously asking Torvald for “spending” money would have avoided her from punishment by law and her husband. Only in the climax when Kristine and Krogstad get back together which was the reason why Krogstad decided to keep the secret out of the public seems questionable. Someone that upset about getting laid off by the husband of the wife he loaned his money to couldn’t have changed his decision in such a short of time. Although the conclusion of A Doll’s House would have fit better in a time period later than the time written, a time where woman’s actions were limited, the play paved way to...