A doll's house
... her. In fact she plays up to him, she plays the role of a child and does not act the role of a mature married mother. Her role is soon very clear; while he lectures her gently and treats her as a child she uses the child like façade in manipulating him into giving in to her. Though Torvald is in charge, taking the leading male role, adopting a conventionally controlling tone when talking about the rules of money, it is Nora through her cajoling, teasing and asking who gets Torvald without him realizing giving her more money. It is her way of controlling him slyly without causing tension. It is as if Nora is playing a game. The scene is relatively difficult because it appears in some ways both of them have the upper hand, in the end we refer to the title of the play. The title ‘A doll’s house’ lets us employ a metaphor to the play to see what is happening in the Helmer household as to somehow reflecting a child’s game featuring an artificial life of dolls manipulated by the doll, master or mistress. The title helps us reflect at who is the one in power of the situation. Because the scene shows us Torvald being assertive but also Nora controlling Torvald and making him give in to her. Symbolically Nora appears to be the doll living in a doll’s house. However we as an audience do not really know who is in control, and the confusion effectively makes us want to find out by seeing the rest of the play. Ibsen raises the issue of truth and deception. Ibsen represents Torvald as honest and hardworking but he has Nora lying. Torvald asks if Nora has been breaking rules and eating macaroons. Nora lies and denies that she has been eating macaroons, declaring that she would never go against Torvald's wishes. (Quotation) Torvald believes her. This is dramatic irony, because we know Nora is lying but Torvald does not. Marriage is about honesty and love. As an audience we now have the advantage and therefore feel superior to Torvald who is being deceived. Could it be Nora’s feelings are emphasised through the business with the macaroons? It seems through this apparently inconsequential domestic situation that Nora’s untruthfulness and independence become noticeable. The macaroons come to symbolise the power, which Nora is able to extract from her femininity and use against her husband. Her lying may not be of any important significant but we do wonder why she feels she needs to lie to him. Her lying also makes us wonder if their relationship is honest and sincere. Could the deception symbolise what is to come later in the play? Will something go wrong? Is this an early indication telling us all is not well? As an audience we begin to ask questions. It intrigues us and we want to see if this relationship will work. Throughout the scene the issue of money is raised often. Money clearly plays an important part in their lives; it is also important because it is clear that the involvement of money plays a part in deciding who is in control of the relationship. The money issue also correlates with the issue of dependence and independence. Torvald’s issuing Nora money reveals he is the breadwinner and Nora has no money of her own, she solely depends on Torvald financially. His money giving represents his financial control over Nora. Yet Ibsen reveals her streak of independency and her ways of overcoming the ways of Torvald’s dominance. Nora’s only financial independence is revealed within the first few lines of the play, at the point where she kindly...