poop
...igital retouching, Betts said “most laptops come with software to get the red out of eyes.” Betts wrote that this practice “was once obscure and narrow . . . [but] now entails whole new realms, drawing on the power of computer technologies to improve light, color and contrast in photos. Patrick Demarchellar said “without Pascal, a lot of photographers wouldn’t exist today,” or in general without alterations in photos, most photographers would have a hard time selling their products. My argument is that photo alteration is a good thing for people to use, to an extent. I think that alterations of photos are okay if that’s what you want. For example, if you have a family photo and you wanted to make minor alterations such as red eyes or the color of a shirt or anything then that’s fine. In my family photo taken a few months ago all of our families shirts were color coordinated except for my mom and dad. They somehow didn’t get their own memo that we were going to coordinate the shirts. My mom didn’t realize this till a couple weeks after the photo was taken. She didn’t like the way they looked so she had the photographer alter the color of their shirts so it would turn out. This is an okay way to use it. I don’t think it is okay for these big companies to portray these celebrities as something they are not, and this will just cause problems wit...