|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
Is social science really a science?
Social science may be defined (broadly) as the rational and systematic study of human society in all its forms with the aim of arriving at an enduring understanding, acknowledged as such by a broad consensus of researchers, of social phenomena.
One of the properties which is necessary to a science is that the activities of its practitioners results in a substantial body of organised "knowledge". ... Thus if social science did not arrive at an enduring understanding of social phenomena, acknowledged as such by a broad consensus of researchers, it would fail to qualify as a science. ...
As an initial attempt to define "science" one might say that it is the collective activity, and the enduring results of that activity, in which the aim is to describe, analyse and understand (in a way which is intelligible to any person with the necessary mental abilities and training) a particular field of empirical phenomena (its qualities, properties, nature and anything else about it which captures our attention and interest), and if possible to predict accurately the development of systems within this field from particular states or in response to particular changes
However, this definition would exclude mathematics from the realm of the sciences.
Approximate Word count = 742
Approximate Pages = 3
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|