dddd
...re?’ Paley came up with two legitimate possibilities, the first is that 'it had laid there forever,’ the second is that it was just chance that the stone happened to be there. Then Paley puts forward the same scenario, yet instead of a stone, you come across a watch. You again ask @how the watch came to be there,’ he says it would be absorb to suggest that the watch had always been there, or it had got there by chance. Paley then questions, “why not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone, why is it not admissible in the case as in the first.” He then answers this question by noting that the watch has something the stone lacks, that is evidence of being designed for a particular purpose, with all the mechanical parts being put together in a particular order. Paley notes “an intelligent person would infer a designer of the watch.” He explains that I the same way, if we look around the world in which we live there is plenty of evidence indicating a ‘design creator.’ Paley used an eye, astronomy, and Newton’s law of motion and gravity to show the universes great complexity. He makes it clear that this could not have simply came around by chance, as in the same way all the...